Evaluating
Impacts on Professional Practice
As an early childhood professional, I need to consider
any “isms” that may impact my personal life because they can affect my work
with young children and their families. In preparing for this blog, I reflected on the
many “isms” that surround both my personal and professional life such as
sexism, classism, ableism, and ageism. These “isms” along with the other “isms”
such as heterosexism, racism and religion-ism, make maneuvering through society
harm-free quite difficult due to the “biases that are built into the system” (Derman-Sparks
& Edwards, 2010, p. 3) that provide either advantages or disadvantages
depending on where you fit in. The dominant culture in the U.S. that is mostly depicted
in the classroom, as well as public policy/laws, is “middle-class, White, suburban,
able-bodied, English-speaking, nuclear family” (Derman-Sparks & Edwards,
2010, p.3).
When I assessed myself based on the “My Social Identities
Portrait” (Derman-Sparks & Edwards, p. 31), I discovered that I identified
with half of the groups that experience discrimination and institutional
prejudice. The one “ism” from my social
identities that I am most passionate and conflicted about is ableism. Ableism
classifies a person with any form of disability-physical, mental, emotional
stability; learning; behavior controls as being less advantaged than
able-bodied, healthy individuals (Derman-Sparks & Edwards, 2010, p. 31). I
am passionate about this “ism” because I
am labeled/classified as a disabled veteran and because of my work with people
with varying abilities. Because I do not appear to have a physical disability,
some people feel comfortable stating their negative, biased views about people
with disabilities in front of me which further drives my compassion as well as
my feelings of conflict. I am conflicted for two reasons: I did not always
openly identify as a disabled veteran or openly admit I have a slight physical
limitation and the gap between inclusion and placement of children with varying
abilities in the education setting.
My passion and conflict around the fair treatment and
inclusion of all children, especially children of varying abilities, directly impact
my work with young children and their families. While I fully believe in the inclusion of all children and their families in
my classroom, I feel conflicted in my capacity to help them and what is
expected through policy. While I am willing to and do accept all children in the classroom, policy directs me to assess
the child, inform the parents, and possibly have the child placed in a special
needs classroom and that is where the conflict arises. How can I teach
inclusion, acceptance, and social justice when the institutional bias/policy outweighs
these concepts? My solution is to keep these children in my classroom as long
as possible, to openly and compassionately communicate with families about their children, and to
work together on a plan to ensure the success of all children in the classroom.
As cited in Ballard (2007) “research strongly suggests that being part of
ordinary classrooms and schools results in disabled children showing more
academic and social learning and more integration into school and community
contexts than disabled children placed in segregated special education
classrooms and schools” (Crawford & Porter, 2004; MacArthur, Kelly,
Higgins, Phillips, McDonald, Morton & Jackman, 2005; UNESCO, 2005). I hope
to see policy change to reflect the findings of this research so others like me
who feel the conflict of addressing ableism in the classroom can work towards
the social justice of all children we so desire.
References
Ballard,
K. (2007). Education and imagination: Strategies for social justice. The Herbison Lecture presented to the
National Conference of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education,
University of Canterbury, 4-7 December 2007. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.511.3922&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Derman- Sparks, L., & Edwards, J. O. (2010). Anti-bias
education for young children and ourselves. Washington, DC: National
Association for the Education of Young Children(NAEYC).